All posts by RTB

From HTC/Android to the Dark Side: Part 1

Yes – I’ve finally joined the ‘wonderful’ world of Apple.

I’ve been using HTC phones for years, before it was commonly known they were even made by the then small HTC – they were simply
branded by Orange as the SPV – Sounds, Pictures, Video – one of the first ‘Smartphones’.

This was before Android was even an itch in Google’s underwear, and HTC devices were running Windows Mobile. It was a slow, flaky
& unreliable operating system, and the phone would frequently crash – but I loved it. The technology and functionality was way
beyond what was currently offered by anyone else – remember early Nokias?

The ability to simply copy files from your PC to your phone, such as text documents, spreadsheets, music and even (initially,
short) videos, was revolutionary, and I fell in love with the brand.

4 or 5 years and 3 SPVs later I was getting a bit sick of the sub-standard operating system provided by our friends at Microsoft.
Fortunately for me, Android came along.

The Android OS gave me more flexibility and reliabilty. I could play entire movies on the high quality screen – great for holidays & travelling or even in waiting rooms. I copied episodes of the series ‘24‘ and ‘Alias‘ onto my phone and would watch them at lunch time at the gym on the running machine!

The first iPhone came out but I believed it to be over priced and over hyped; I didn’t like the restrictions that ‘Mother Apple’ placed on you – I prefered the openness and freedom an Android phone gave you. I considered other Android phones made by manufacturers such as Samsung, but always prefered the looks, price, and features of what seemed to be superior HTC models.

My last HTC phone, the One S, was a slim, impressive device. But only a year into my two year contract I started to get frustrated. The battery life was poor. If I spent more than 30 mins watching films/playing games/surfing the web then the battery would die before bed time. The lack of expandable memory on this device and my desire to load it with music and entertainment meant it had soon expired, and I was in a constant battle to keep space clear.

Then there was the reliability. It started getting slow, and regularly crashing.

At this point I would be grumbling and my girlfriend would helpfully interject with a sweet comment such as “on my iPhone, that
doesn’t happen” or “oh, on the iPhone you can do suchandsuch instead, isn’t that better?“.

Around this point I was having some problems with my laptop too. Ok, I was always having problems with my laptop – it’s running a
Microsoft operating system, hello! – but the damn thing was grinding to a halt and having problems recognising USB devices, including the mouse. After a memory upgrade and a repair of Windows it was better, but still running slowly.

Enter the ever helpful girlfriend.

Look how many tabs I’ve got open“, showing me the 40+ tabs she has open on her (relatively old) iMac. I had 15 and it was running at a snails pace.

Look what soandso piece of software can do” – etc.

Then there’s my brother, friends, family, colleagues, all talking about how wonderful their iPad/iPhone/iMac is – especially about how nicely they all interact together.

I started seriously considering getting an iMac. I’ve always stuck by the idiom ‘why make life hard for yourself’ – and my Windows laptop was making life hard for me.

But they’re not cheap, and it’s a big jump, changing all the software I’m used to etc etc.

Then came the ideal opportunity to test the waters of the dark side… my phone contract was finally coming up for renewal.

I ordered a shiny new iPhone5c in white. Having been frustrated by the lack of expandable storage space on my 16GB HTC, I was
disappointed that you couldn’t expand the iPhone’s either, and opted for a large 32GB model.

I’ve now been a member of ‘the Apple family’ for a couple of weeks.

Have I turned towards the dark side??

Find out in my next post as I compare the iPhone5c to my HTC One S.

My car history part 3: Financial crisis strikes!

After selling the awe inspiring but back breaking Lotus Elise in Autumn 2006 and putting some of the money back into my mortgage, I decided that I needed something reasonably sensible – a baby was on the way!

The drug dealers car: A black BMW
The drug dealers car: A black BMW

I still wanted something with some ‘oomph’… I found a 2001 black BMW 3 series convertible (Y312UGC) that the pram would fit in the back of – perfect!

Except… it wasn’t.

It had a 3 litre flat 6 engine and where that produced plenty of power, it did indeed feel somewhat – flat. And heavy, after the lightweight Elise and relatively light MX-5. It just wasn’t fun to drive. Plus driving a black beamer, everyone treated you as if you were a cock.

Or a drug dealer.

Also, with Annie (my daughter) on her way, the wife at the time wanted something safer than the Audi A4 (her model performing surprisingly poorly in the safety tests) and we bought a 2002 Mazda6 1.8 in electric blue (MK52LKA); think it was around the £6K mark.

Great car. She still had it until recently (some idiot drove into the back of it end of June 2014) and although it was utterly scratched and battered (thank’s to her ‘spirited’ driving) it was still going strong, with only a flat battery to complain about in it’s 8 years of loyal service.

In the autumn of 2008 we had the financial crash!

My contract was not renewed and I was out of work for 5 months. Supporting a wife at Uni and with a 1 year old to feed, I was forced to the sell the BMW with a heavy loss – I got 7K for her and had bought her for 12.5k only 18 months before. It was a bad time to sell a thirsty (hard economic times) convertible (summer had ended) but I needed the cash…

My 'cheapo' Hyundai Coupe
My ‘cheapo’ Hyundai Coupe

I bought myself a cheap £900 Hyundai Coupe 2.0 in silver (S something TMB – Tommy Boy!). It was quite a lot of car for the money; leather interior, sunroof etc. The engine was meaty enough but not exactly refined; a bit noisy and the handling was pretty awful – but I had fun chucking her about 🙂

By spring 2009 I had some cash in my pockets again. I recalled the halcyon days of soft-top motoring and considered an MX-5 again… but fancied something different, and looked at the MG-TF but was put of by reliability issues.

My Toyota MR2 - plus racing stripes!
My Toyota MR2 – plus racing stripes!

In the end I decided Japanese reliability was the way to go, and chose a year 2000 blue Toyota MR2 for around the 3-4K mark. It had a happy easy revving 1.8 litre 140ish bhp engine (pretty much the same one as had been in the Elise, although that had been tuned to 190bhp) in a light car, and was pretty nippy. It was good fun whizzing over those Milton Keynes roundabouts (where I was working at the time). I was never keen on the general looks and bland blue colour, so, heading back to the trusted Halfords/eBay, I added racing stripes and a rear spoiler.

As you do 🙂

But the MR2 wasn’t to last long…

The MR2 and Mazda6
The MR2 and Mazda6

Next part of the story: Exotic car threesome

The curse of the Matrix

No, not the one Neo dealt with.

I’m talking about motorway matrix signs.

These matrix signs are those digital boards at the side of the motorway that supposedly display useful traffic information. The
idea is to aid traffic flow and reduce congestion.

Except they don’t.

Not used in the way they currently are anyway, particularly on the M6 between Stoke and the Manchester area – but I’m certain the
case is true in many other areas.

Useless matrix sign
Useless matrix sign

The idea is that traffic flow is monitored and when congestion starts to occur further on ahead, matrix signs suggest a reduced speed before the affected area. In theory, approaching traffic will slow down and by the time they reach the troubled area, the congestion ahead will be eased.

One problem is down to the way it is managed. There is often a delay before the message is displayed, by which time the congestion has already eased – so traffic at one point in the flow slows down unnecessarily.

Which can then cause congestion behind it.

Or there is no matrix sign located at a suitable point before the congestion; so the warning appears too late, when the
congestion has already been reached; or even too early: so drivers become frustrated at the reduced speed and ignore it anyway.

There’s also the lack of understanding of these signs by most road users and the somewhat different responses they can provoke:

Congestion ahead? Well… I’ll slow down when I get to it, not before it!

Or:

Congestion ahead? Well – I’d better slam the brakes on immediately and slow down!

Thus, when a “Congestion ahead – 40mph” message appears on a busy but flowing motorway, with drivers in the left hand lane typically
doing between 60 and 70mph, drivers in the middle lane doing between 70 and 75mph, and, let’s face it, drivers in the right hand
lane doing somewhere between 75 and 90mph – chaos ensures.

Rule following driver A in the middle lane, passing a lorry, travelling previously at 70mph, slams on his brakes to slow down to
40mph quickly.

Mr I’m-in-a-rush Driver B in the outside lane sees brake lights in the middle lane but scoffs at the warning and sees the right
hand lane ahead is clear, so increases his 80mph speed to overtake the ‘fools’ in the middle lane.

Average Joe Driver C in the middle lane, who is behind Driver A, panics at the brake lights, and not having left enough space in
front, decides his only option is to move into the fast lane – straight into the path of the accelerating Driver B.

Not good.

Obviously this is a rather extreme representation of what can happen, but I have seen a similar situation develop, many, many
times. Drivers panic and slow down abruptly, whilst others choose to ignore it – they don’t want to be told by computers to slow down because of something ahead that they can’t even see – they will make the decision using their own brains thank you very much!

And there’s those drivers that have experienced the early/late/outdated matrix warnings as I’ve outlined above previously and take the message with a pinch of salt.

I.e. ignore them.

So they don’t work. And in the extreme cases as highlighted above, can be dangerous.

As my esteemed ex-colleague Dave (AKA “MR GRUMP“) would say, matrix signs are “self-prophesying”.

Congestion 40mph“?

There is now!!

Admittedly, they can be useful.

Messages that display that a junction or road ahead is closed is useful and can allow you to plan ahead.

Unfortunately they still seem to distract the slower-witted drivers from the road as they struggle to read them, momentarily
forgetting that they are on a motorway, and drift from their lanes or fail to notice the vehicle in front of them slowing down.

For many, they are a dangerous distraction.

Especially when the message is obscure, irrelevant, or downright stupid – which is often the case.

Take some examples.

Don’t litter”

Ok. I won’t. But don’t put this on roadside sign where people are passing at 70mph. It’s distracting, and pointless, as people generally aren’t littering whilst driving down a motorway. And those that do are hardly likely to respond to it. There’s another variant I’ve seen on this: “Bin your litter: Other people do“.

Sheesh – way to put me on a guilt trip!

How about:

Wear your seat belt

I’m sure I learnt that when I was doing my driving test. Actually, I learnt it as a small child. I don’t need a a matrix sign to tell me that, thank you.

Firefighter strike drive with extra care

Oh ok. When they’re back off strike, I’ll drive like an idiot.

Scottish airports check with airline for flight details

Erm. Ok. I will. Thanks.

Unfortunately, motorway matrix warning signs are another case of technology being used for the sake of it, rather than solving a
problem. In this case, they actually create them.

Although it’s not always the advanced technology to blame for signage stupidity, as the following example shows…

Useless sign
Useless sign

Drive safe, people.

My car history part 2: The love affair begins

In 2003 the fun began!

I’d managed to get rid of my third car, an unreliable and costly Peugeot 306. I’d been out of Uni a couple of years and had managed to save some cash up. I started looking for a ‘sports car’…

My first MX-5/Roadster - 'Maggy'
My first MX-5/Roadster – ‘Maggy’

After much research and playing with spreadsheets and checking insurance costs, I purchased a 1990 Jap Import Eunos Roadster (i.e. a Mazda MX-5) 1.6 V-Special in British Racing Green (H872ATV), imported into the UK in 1999. What a brilliant little car! I kept it for 3 years; and did my first work ever on a car including taking the door apart and fixing the electric window. I replaced the worn black soft-top with a new tan hood to match the interior and fitted white alloys. I started browsing Halfords, eBay and MX5Parts daily looking for new shiny accessories, and fitted a wood effect interior (in hindsight – yuk).

I kept her for 3 years and drove everywhere in her. It was the first car I truly named: Maggy.

I almost cried the day I sold her. And I still regret to this day selling her… although she was starting to get a bit tatty (rust on the window surround, paint peeling) she was mechanically perfect and I think the only thing I had to fix in those three years of ownership was the electric window.

But she wasn’t to be my last MX-5… a few years would pass, but I would go on to own 4 more. But more about that in future posts.

I only sold her because it had been 3 years and I fancied a change and something flashier and newer – and I had cash burning a hole in my pocket. I’d moved house and I had some money free which I intended to put back into the mortgage later, but decided to purchase a fancy car for 3 months, just to experience it, then sell it and put the money back into the house and get something cheaper.

My Lotus Elise - 'Ellie' - and 'Maggy' in the background
My Lotus Elise – ‘Ellie’ – and ‘Maggy’ in the background

So, in the spring of 2006, I bought a 2004 Lotus Elise S2, a S111R which had the high revving VTEC Toyota engine with a huge kick. The engine produced 190bhp which isn’t much compared to some of the other options out there (250-300bhp Suburas etc) but the car weighed less than 900kg so it leaped from 0 to 60mph in 4.9 seconds – amazing. And the handling was astonishing; she was glued to the road around corners. I used to go for a blast on country roads and the adrenaline surge was fantastic.

Amazing machine… but a terrible car!

My Lotus Elise - 'Ellie'
My Lotus Elise – ‘Ellie’

The single windscreen wiper was practically useless, the aircon was like an asthmatic coughing at you through a straw (to borrow a quote from Jeremy Clarkson). The seats were very uncomfortable; I could last a max of 35 mins before screaming in agony. Shame I had a 40 minute drive to work. I’d be writhing around the cabin for the last 5 minutes of the journey and practically fall out of the car – if I could, you couldn’t get out of the car if you couldn’t open the door fully – which I couldn’t in the tight parking spaces at work – due to the wide sill and low door.

Which started falling off… fortunately, I managed to sell it back to another dealer for £1000 less than I’d bought it for. £333 a month to have had the experience of that car seemed worth it – you’d pay more a month for a new Ford Mondeo and be tied in for 2 years.

Around that time I also bought my girlfriend at the time a £150 (I think it was only that much) purple Vauxhall Cavalier 1.6 (’92/’93 plate I recall) to learn to drive in. Great fun, it was pretty pokey! It used to slide all over the road even more than the old Astra though. We managed to get a year out of it before the fuel lines rotted and we decided to scrap it, replacing it around 2005 with a ’98 (was it an S reg?) red Audi A4 1.6 for around 2K. Somewhat more luxurious, it was heavier than the Cavalier and a bit disappointing and dull to drive, but it served its purpose for a couple of years.

Around 2004, my 2 year bike CBT had expired. Since I’d bought the MX-5 I’d hardly used the bike, and living in Cotgrave as opposed to the original idea of Beeston (bad traffic) meant that I didn’t really gain any rush hour advantages. Seeing as it would be expensive and time consuming to do the full test (would have to take a week off work), I decided to sell the bike.

It would be 9 years before I hopped back on that (mechanical) horse…

Next part of the story: Financial crisis strikes

Montignac Diet Part 2: What Can I Eat?

There’s a few variations on the Montignac method that have developed over the years.

This is our interpretation – and it seems to have worked, and allows us to eat tasty, healthy food, and loose weight. With this way of eating and a combination of Slim XL (a natural dietary aid which I will write a post on in the near future) I’ve easily lost 10kg (22lbs – about 1.5 stone) with much less exercise that I previously did.

Our understanding of the concept is this.

Don’t eat high GI carbs with fats, particularly saturated ones like butter and fried meat.
You can eat fats, but try and stick to things like olive oil and fish oil, and not at the same time as eating carbs.

I.e. wait approximately 2 hours between eating high GI carbs and eating fats, don’t eat them together.

Simple!

It throws the typical British meat and two veg meal system out of the window though. And even our favourite Indian adopted meal, the curry!

A typical dish eaten by the average European, or American, and in fact, many nationalities, would consist of something like meat, potatoes/rice/pasta/bread, and some other vegetable or fruit.

The problem with that is you’re combining the high GI ‘bad’ carbs (potatoes/rice/pasta/bread) with fat; especially if your ‘meat’ portion is a battered fish, a chicken kiev or BBQ chicken (with skin), a beef burger, a creamy lamb curry etc.

And often people will follow immediately with a sugary dessert.

Eating a lean portion of oven baked chicken breast with the ‘bad’ carbs and skipping any sauces or sides of butter will be fine – high GI carbs + no fats is not an issue – at least in terms of this diet; high GI carbs may still increase your blood sugar level so diabetics be careful! However, most people will opt to eat a baked chicken with it’s skin still on, or a greasy burger, or breadcrumb – or even worse – battered fish; all of which have a high fat content. High GI carbs + fats is bad, or so the Montignac theory goes.

Similarly, a fatty chicken or fatty creamy lamb curry isn’t so bad if you skip the potatoes or rice – fat + no GI carbs is fine.

Chips are the worst – potatoes have a very high GI and you’re absolutely soaking them in fat, and a saturated one at that!

But don’t panic – you can still eat tasty food, and still fill yourself up.

Instead of having steak, potatoes and tomatoes, why not have steak, a poached egg and tomatoes?

You’ve replaced the high GI offender with an egg, which is just fat and proteins.

And the egg should fill you up just as much as a few potatoes. Tomatoes have some carbs, but they have a low GI value.

Throughout this, I’ve neglected to mention proteins.

Let’s bring these fellas into the discussion.

For the sake of our argument and this method, let’s say that food basically consists of carbs, fats and/or proteins.

Protein performs many roles in the human body, including muscle repair and growth. Human hair is essentially used up protein.

The important factor here though is that protein fills you up.

That’s a very important factor when choosing any diet. If you feel hungry, you’re likely to snack, usually on whatever food you can get your hands on at the time – which tends not to be healthy food. Montignac was aware of this and is happy for you to eat between meals, as long as you’re still following the rules.

Getting plenty of protein in your day will fill you up for longer. If you’re full up for longer, you’re going to eat less in the day, which ultimately is going to help with weight loss.

Foods with high protein content include nuts, legumes (beans, lentils etc), fish, or one of my favourites, eggs.

But aren’t eggs bad for you??

There’s been many debates about eggs and cholesterol levels, but the evidence seems to show that eggs do not cause high cholesterol levels. The old rule of 3 eggs a week is out the window. 3 eggs a day is perfectly fine. There are plenty of athletes and body builders who eat several eggs every day and do not have any cholesterol issues.

Ok, fried eggs aren’t so good, as eggs contain a fair bit of fat anyway, and frying them in something like vegetable oil is a big no no. Poach your egg. Too fiddly? Ok, boil it. Scrambled eggs are great, especially with a dash of salt (not too much mind!) and black pepper.

If you eat 3 (non-fried) eggs a day and you’re not taking in significant fat elsewhere in the day then you’re eating a reasonable amount of fat (more on this later – don’t eat JUST fat!!).

What about calories?

Ok, this diet doesn’t really consider calories. It’s more concerned about your carb, fat and protein intake, and more importantly, the combinations in which they are eaten. But bear this in mind: the same amount of fat has more than twice as much calories as protein and carbs:

1 gram of protein or carbs – 4kcal
1 gram of fat – 9 kcal

I.e. if you’re trying to keep your calories down, keep the fats down!

Back to the allowed combinations. To summarise, possible options are:

High GI carbs + fat = bad
Low GI carbs + fat = ok
High GI carbs on their own = ok
Fats on their own = ok

(assuming you are eating the High GI carbs and fats separately with a gap of approximately 2 hours)

You can add proteins in to any of these, it doesn’t change the results:

High GI carbs + fat + protein = bad
Low GI carbs + fat + protein = ok
High GI carbs + protein = ok
Fat + protein = ok

The proteins will fill you up longer though – so try and get these in there to keep you full and happy, and ultimately you will eat less. In this case, less is definitely more!

Don’t forgot my rule: Everything in moderation. You can still treat yourself from time to time. Still fancy that sugary dessert? It’s not bad every now and then… but try and wait an hour or two after the main course. You may even find you not hungry later anyway.

You should also consider how much of each food group you are eating in a day. This will not only affect your weight loss, but other factors, such as heart health – you don’t want to be eating too much fat. Just because fat on it’s own without the high GI carbs is classed as ‘ok’ in the sense of this diet, it’s not ok to just eat fat all day long!

For someone of my age and height (36, 5ft 10in/178cm), you should eat around 50g of fat, 100-150g of carbs (the less the better to loose weight) and aim for around 100-150g of protein – if you only managed 50g of proteins thats fine but try and eat more to fill you up longer (note that these are just guidelines and not ‘hard and fast’ rules).

Hang on.

This sounds like a lot of effort!

How do I work all this out?

How do I know if a food has a high or low GI value? How do I add up how much fat, protein, and carbs I’m eating in a day?

Don’t worry (‘be happy… dunka dunka’ to loosely quote Bob Marley).

It’s up to you how much effort you put in.

You can browse the web to find GI values and create a spreadsheet to work out what the best replacement low GI carbs or proteins are for you, and colour code it to work out ideal combinations. That’s what I did. Yes, it was a lot of effort at first, but it was worth it, and now I just ‘know’ what are good and bad combos.

Once you start doing something regularly, it becauses automatic, a habit. There’s a great book on this, The Power of Habit (will add a link in a bit) , which also covers willpower – I will probably write another post about this later.

Or you can just reduce the high carb GIs in your meals. Get rid of the spuds. Swap the egg fried rice for a low GI long grain basmati or brown rice; replace with more meat/fish or a protein replacement if you’re not being filled up enough.

Or reduce the fat you’re eating with those carbs – you can still have a jacket potato, but replace the butter for baked beans (watch out for the high sugar or salt content though in most tinned baked beans, you can buy reduced salt/sugar versions). Don’t put butter (or even marge – see my post Fats: Butter vs Marge) on your sandwich; do you really need it? A few slices of cucumber or tomato is usually enough to moisten the bread. Skip the mayonnaise: yoghurt is a healthier alternative.

Or you can look at a few of the meals I will suggest in future posts.

Or you could buy Montignac’s excellent book (well, 15 million people bought it so it can’t be bad!) Eat Yourself Slim: The World’s BEST Method full of delicious but healthy French and Mediterranean recipes.

I’m also planning (possibly, in the future) to create an online calculator which will allow you to enter a days worth of the food you ate, which will then highlight the bad points and suggest an alternative. It’s just an idea at the moment and I would need to look into the technical difficulties and costs, I may need to charge a small fee to cover this… who would be interested?

I just want to point out again that I am not a nutritionist, a dietician or a doctor. I’m a computer scientist! So this is just my take on things… but it’s worked well for me and my girlfriend. When dieting you should always seek professional help if in doubt.

Iceland Trip Part 2: Ice Ice Baby

We woke up on the second day of our short trip to glorious Icelandic sunshine.

Checking out of the hotel, we wandered across the road to visited the geysers Strokkur and Geysir.

The English word Geyser actually comes from Geysir; this geyser only erupts infrequently and can often stop for years, but when
it does can spray water up to 70 meters high.

We’d been told that Strokkur would erupt every 8 minutes. In reality though, this can vary.

Walking towards the geysir, we saw it erupt in the distance but weren’t quick enough to take a snap. Not expecting it to fire
again for 8 minutes, we were unprepared when it erupted quickly twice more.

When we arrived we took up camera positions opposite the steaming hole and waited.

You could feel the tension in the air. Tourists lined up with cameras at the ready, trying to get the perfect spot. A group of British teenage girls babbled inanities behind me.

10 minutes later, she still hadn’t blown.

There were complaints of “my arm is aching” and “I’ve been waiting here years now” from behind.

Clouds of steam and the smell of sulphur wafted past us. My poor joke of “ah, the eggs are ready” went unappreciated by my girlfriend.

Then a chorus from the rear of the popular childhood song “Why are we waiting“.

Suddenly Strokkur bubbled loudly, and a burst of water spurted anti climatically a few feet into the air and subsided.

There were groans of disappointment from the dejected schoolgirls.

However, the next eruption, approximately 9 minutes later, was spectacular.

Strokkur geyser erupts
Strokkur geyser erupts

There was no warning either. Strokkur shot water 10 meters (33 feet) into the air, soaking those that had stood too close with water, amid screams of surprise and joy.

I’d managed to snap a couple of satisfactory shots and time was ticking, so we headed off on the short (10 mins or so) drive to
the waterfall at Selfoss.

Waterfalls at Selfoss
Waterfalls at Selfoss

 

The waterfall is actually a series of waterfalls, Selfoss itself being 11m high, before joining Dettifoss which is apparently the most powerful waterfall in Europe; the river falls 44m over a width of 100m.

The waters are formed by the melting glacier Vatnajökull.

For the first time on our visit, we saw ice – the Langjökull glacier could be just seen in the distance.

We now had a long drive ahead of us. One of the more spectacular sites in south Iceland is the ice lagoon at Jökulsárlón and we
were determined to see it, despite the 4 hour predicted drive.

The maximum speed limit in Iceland is 90kmph, and although we had noted roadside police and speed cameras on the outskirts of the
capital Reykjavik, we hadn’t seen any since (despite a few speed camera signs on the main road ‘1’ from Selfoss towards Vik and
Jökulsárlón there weren’t any devices apparent) and most people seemed to be driving at around 120kmph (75mph). Although the 1 is
a single carriageway (aside from a few overtaking areas on hills) it is very smooth and in good condition (apart from a few spots
where the sides were gradually starting to crumble away into gravel) and with very little traffic on it – we only saw one lorry
in the whole two days, and a couple of tractors – we made good progress.

Petrol stations are few are far between in Iceland, so seeing that we had only half a tank left and spotting a self service (pay
by card at machine) pump just after joining the ‘1’ after leaving the ’30’, we decided to top up our little Hyundai i20 hire car
(hired with our usual cashback by making use of the TopCashBack site).

Just a note here – roads marked ‘F’ are for off road vehicles only. 4×4 / SUVs can be expensive to hire and as we were only there
for the weekend we had opted for a standard car and to avoid these roads. Nonetheless, cutting across country from Gulfoss to
Flúðir had entailed driving down some more basic gravel roads. The car hadn’t struggled at all but we’d been wary of flying gravel. Our hire car was in good shape but had a few paint chips already on the bumper and the damage report on check out had marked these along with a side note ‘gravel damage on bumper’, but just be careful with this as they can be quite strict and it’s easy to damage a vehicle with all that loose gravel, especially if another car comes whizzing by at high speed.

We had intended breaking up the long drive by stopping at the waterfall at Seljalandsfoss and locating the hot springs just
beyond at Seljavallalaug, near Skógafoss.

However, we’d woken later than planned and stayed longer waiting for Strokkur’s eruption; so we only stopped to take a few quick
snaps of the waterfalls at Seljalandsfoss and Skógafoss and not seeing any clear signs to the thermal pool at Seljavallalaug, we
sped onwards, taking in the ever changing scenery and passing Eyjafjallajökull, the volcano that had erupted in 2010 causing
travel chaos due to it’s ash clouds.

One moment we’d see rolling green fields and hills; the next it would be completely flat black earth. After half an hour it would
suddenly change to rounded boulders covered with moss and lichen; it reminded me of the trolls from Disney’s Frozen.

Perhaps this is were the fabled elves lived!

Apparently, more than half of the Icelandic people believe in the existence or possible existence of ‘the hidden people’ –
Huldufolk. There’s an interesting article on the BBC news site here about them.

The scenery changed endless times and we admired the great open spaces, pretty farm houses and numerous waterfalls, rivers and
lakes as we passed by.

We saw the glacier’s of Tindfjallajökull and Eyjafjallajökull nestling amongst the mountains to our right.

Black beach at Dyrhólaey
Black beach at Dyrhólaey

Before we got to the town of Vik, about 2.5 hours from Geysir or Reykjavik, we took the side road to Dyrhólaey to visit the
beautiful black sand beach and to look for Puffins. Unfortunately we didn’t see any, probably due to the fact that many other
tourists had decided to do the same and the spot was crowded with humanity. The lovely scenery however had been worth the detour.

We set off again and continued our long trek, now being able to glimpse the huge glacier of Vatnajökull in this distance.

Despite the magnificent backdrop, we were becoming tired and started to worry about how late it was and the fact that we had an
even longer journey back home to the airport.

We followed the endless snake of tarmac through the increasingly barren landscape, passing close to the glacier and staring in
awe at it’s majesty.

We drove on and passed black fields of lava boulders.

As we passed a small car park to our left, we glanced through the black rocks and saw a shining vista of white and blue ice.

We had arrived at the ice lagoon!

Blue ice drifts past the black sand
Blue ice drifts past the black sand

Pulling up initially at a car park on the right hand side before the bridge over the Jökulsárlón river, we pulled our aching
bodies from the car and wandering down onto the beach to watch two cow sized chunks of diamond blue ice float by on the breeze. Smaller chunks of clear ice sat on the black sands being lapped gently by the tide.

We then crossed the road and climbed the rocks to see the spectacular ice lagoon below us.

Ice lagoon
Ice lagoon

It’s hard to describe the beauty of the various shades of blue and white ice lying in the lagoon, smaller chunks floating serenely
by. I’d let the pictures do the talking but they simply don’t do the atmosphere and beauty of the place justice.

A dog takes a dip in the Ice Lagoon
A dog takes a dip in the Ice Lagoon

We stayed for some time, walking around and taking photos, but for the first time in our two days in Iceland, we were cold.

We crossed the bridge to the main car park and pulled up next to a small restaurant offering hot soup and coffee. We both went for
the seafood soup (the mushroom option didn’t look very inspiring) which was very tasty and warmed us up beautifully for the drive
back home.

Short on time but determined to at least locate the third hot spring we’d intended to visit, Seljavallalaug, I scoured the road
signs on the drive home around Skógafoss looking for the alleged dirt road towards ‘Seljavellir’.

No such sign exists and as the weather had deteriorated and the going was a little slower, decided to continue towards the airport.

However, for those wanting to visit, I have since located the site via google maps. You will go past a large U shape mountain
enclosure around a handful of buildings in the distance; turn up the 242 sign posted Raufarfell. Hotel Lambafell and guesthouse
Edinborg are also up this road. Carry straight on rather than turning right at the 242 Raufarfellsvegur sign and drive to the end
of the road. The pool is a short walk from there.

Seljavallalaug is a man made geothermal pool, fed by a natural hot spring. It was constructed in 1923 and is a 25 by 10 meter
construction in the mountainside. There are small rooms for people to leave their clothes in. The water however is apparently
only cleaned once every summer so it may look a bit dirty.

We were happy we’d managed to spend so much time at the hot spring of Hrunalaug so didn’t mind missing this one so much. We got
back to the airport bang on time.

One thing we’d missed off the typical tourist sites was the blue lagoon. I wouldn’t go as far as calling this a ‘tourist trap’
but it isn’t cheap and isn’t so natural. However, it does look rather nice and with more time could be tempted to make the most
of it with one of the more inclusive packages.

We would definitely visit again. Next time though we will stay for longer and hire a 4×4; I will also study the maps closer to
ensure we don’t miss anything!!
You can buy the Lonely Planet Iceland (Travel Guide) from Amazon.

My car history part 1: 3 cars and a bike

In the summer of 1995, I got my first car.

An orange Metro!
An orange Metro!

It was a bright orange 1980 Austin Metro 1L (NAU314W). No it wasn’t my choice. My dad was buying and also paying for the insurance; the Escort Mk2 or even a Fiesta I would have preferred were significantly more to insure. I had the option of a Skoda, a Lada or a Metro. I went for the latter 🙂

It cost £350 and I think about the same to insure. I managed to get her up to 84mph once but it certainly couldn’t be described as quick – that was with a certain amount of run up and downhill aid. Still, she was fun to drive, with her floppy gearbox and basic interior – not only was there no stereo, there was nowhere to fit a stereo. My dad wired one in and it sat on the floor of the passenger footwell. It was a ‘secure’ one where you slid pretty much the whole unit out of a metal cage and took it with you. Used to weigh a ton in my college bag! Another Stewart Armstrong (my late pops) fitting was the fan switch (with ‘FAN’ tippexed in his wonderful handwriting) so I could manually turn the fan on in traffic (after overheating one day in Grim old Grimsby).

My brother took over once he was 17 (and crashed it many, many times, the end result being it 10% shorter and only one-wheeled drive) with me borrowing my dad’s rather executive 1984 Ford Granada 2.8L (A34GRJ) auto in ‘Mink’ – a browny-grey metallic colour that looked a lot nicer than it sounds. This was a huge beast of a car compared to the Metro and quite luxurious with electric windows, sunroof and all the ‘mod cons’.

He then upgraded to a 1993 Ford Mondeo 2L (L259MUD – ‘Muddy’) which was a very nice car to drive and felt very quick; I remember driving to Scotland in it and being surprised to note I was doing 90mph when I’d only thought I was doing 60; it was very smooth.

I had the Metro still when I started University in ’97 but quickly upgraded to a white 1986 Vauxhall Astra 1.3L (D635UFE). I recall it costing about 7 or 8 hundred pounds. This had considerably more ‘oomph’ than the Metro and I started to drive a little more like a teenager (I’d been a very slow, cautious driver before) but it’s handling was, erm, pretty poor to be honest. The suspension was far too soft and coming down the back roads to East Leake enroute to Loughborough Uni could be a bit hairy; she’d ‘wallow’ about going over hills and I had a few scary moments in her where I thought I’d end up in a field. Fortunately, I didn’t. Unlike my Uni mate John who seemed quite proud that he’d rolled his 205!

My Peugeot 306
My Peugeot 306

After finishing Uni and starting my first proper job in the autumn of 2000 I was able to buy something a little better; a 1993 Peugeot 306 1.6L (L505VAG) for £3500. I say better… it wasn’t. I spent £1000 in the first year replacing what Peugeot Wollaton said were ‘essential parts’ (think I was conned) and another £1000 the next year and I think about the same again when the timing belt went and smashed the engine to smithereens. After 3 years I decided to get rid; the radiator decided to leak on the day of sale so my sale price dropped from the originally agreed £1800 to £1500.

Around 2002 I also got my first motorbike. I was planning on moving to Beeston, and knew the traffic would be awful getting to work. My Dad had got into bikes in the last few years too so I’d started to have an interest… and realised that they’d be great for cutting through rush hour car queues.

I did the half a day (back then) CBT test and bought a Honda NSR125. It was a bizarre combination of black, pink and green with turquoise wheels! It had some body panels missing so a bronze frame was partially visible – strange, yet cool, and the cheapest 125 I could find at £950 (larger bikes were much cheaper oddly).

I hadn’t realised that it was the fastest 125 you could buy! I recall accelerating once from 50 thinking I was going up to 70 and it had passed 90 already… most 125s of the time struggled to reach 70.

My dad working on my unreliable Honda NSR125
My dad working on my unreliable Honda NSR125

Unfortunately, it had been severely tinkered with, and had an air filter from a Aprilla that had had several holes drilled in it, and it kept cutting out. I had a few more problems and my Dad recommended a 4 stroke rather than a 2 stroke; I managed to sell it back to the same company for £750 and I forked out about £1200 for a dark blue Yamaha SR125.

This was more a of a classical bike, with shiny chrome – but rather dull – it struggled to get over 60mph. But it was still very handy for morning rush hour traffic.

My Yamaha SR125
My Yamaha SR125

The fun didn’t begin until 2003 and a love affair started that is still going strong 11 years on.

Next part of the story: The love affair begins

Iceland trip Part 1: Where’s the ice?

I hadn’t expected Iceland to be so green, or so warm.

Admittedly we’d visited there in summer, end of July 2014.

Yet somehow I’d expected something more barren; cold, wet and windy.

As it was, it was raining and breezy when our flight got in at 11.30pm, and the next morning when we woke up it was overcast and drizzling. Yet it had been mild at around 15C as we set off in our hire car (booked via TopCashBack again to save some money!) to explore.

The first thing we noticed as we skirted the edges of Reykajavik and headed towards ‘The Golden Circle’ was how green thlandscape was. True, there were rugged moutains in the background, but the fields of green and gently rolling hillocks reminded me of Derbyshire, and some of the foilage of the Scottish landlands.

It was still drizzling as we pulled up at our first stop, the small town of Hveragerði. Here we hoped to find the hot spring of Reykjadalur.

However, as we were soon to discover, tourist sights are not well signposted.

After a quick pit-stop at a Bonus store (look for the rather high looking pink pig) to stock up on Icelandic chocolate for, erm,energy for the hike, we found an information board with the keyword we were looking for: Reykjadalur. The rest was in Icelandic, but there was an arrow, so off we went!

It wasn’t clear at all where to go after that. The path forked off in separate directions. It seemed though that we needed to head off further up the road; we could see a few obvious hikers in that direction and the green hills loomed yonder. The description I’d read was:

Reykjadalur (literal translation: ‘Steam Valley’) is one of the easiest hot spring areas to reach from Reykjavík. A short drive (45 minutes) brings you to the town Hveragerði and from there you can hike up to the warm river that flows down Reykjadalur.

The hike is not very demanding (although it’s not recommended for people that are afraid of heights since at one point you’ll be hiking along the top of a deep gorge) and you reach the warm river after about 45-90 minutes (depending on how fast you walk and how often you stop to take pictures of the waterfall in the gorge and all the pretty bubbling muddy hot springs on the way).

There are no facilities for changing your clothes when you get up there.

So we headed towards the hillside.

Hot mud springs
Hot mud springs

But no matter which path we chose, we couldn’t seem to find a way to scale it. Although we were enjoying ourselves exploring and had indeed found hot mud springs this was clearly not what we were looking for and certainly not a place we could take a dip – warning signs showed the temperature to be 80-100C.

There were a few other signs around, but none mentioned Reykjadalur.

Despite the drizzle we enjoyed our stroll and the steamy scenery, only slightly disapointed we couldn’t find our intended destination. We thought about going off path and heading directly for the hill side but both it’s steepness and the cautionary signs about new hot springs forming changed our minds, and determined to make the most of our limited time there, we headed back to the car.

Next stop was the Thingvellir (Þingvellir) National Park.

The oldest existing parliament in the world first assembled there in 930 AD. The area is protected as a national park due to its unique geology and natural features. Almannagjá is a canyon formed between two tectonic plates, a visual representation of continental drift. The waters in and around Þingvellir are a popular destination for fishing as well as scuba diving.

As we drove in a large circle around the park, enjoying the splendid lake and mountain scenery, the sun popped out to say hello, and lit the scene with a warming glow. Again, we had to ask ourselves, were we in Iceland or Wales? There was certainly no ice to be seen.

2014-07-26 15.38.36
Waterfall in Thingveller National Park

We stopped at a few places to take some photographs and visit one of the many impressive waterfalls, then attempted to find the second hot spring on our list.

This time we were successful.

The description had read:

Hrunalaug – another hot spring near Reykjavik

Hrunalaug is also easily accessible from Reykjavík. It is about an hour’s drive, close to the village of Flúðir. You need to drive road no 344 (Hrunavegur) from Flúðir and turn off it towards Sólheimar. Drive past the church and stop when you come to a parking space that has a ‘no camping’ sign. Just over the hill (2 minute walk) is Hrunalaug.

The pool itself is actually split into 2 pools. There is a little man made hut built over one pool, that is like a hot tub for 2-4 people. A little trickle of a river runs through the hut from the other pool that is slightly larger. The little hut is convenient to change your clothes in (or well, just take them off – most people just bathe naked since there is no-one around you!), especially at winter time.

I’d improve this somewhat by adding that the 344 is marked ‘Hruni’ and you have to drive for quite a few minutes before seeing the turn off towards Solheimar; you will see the mentioned church. There was a hand written road sign saying ‘Hrunalaug 400m’ although I’d estimate it to be a bit further than that; you then take the next right hand turn and you will come to the car park.

This is a lovely little spot with great views down the valley.

Taking a dip in the hot spring
Taking a dip in the hot spring

When we arrived there were a couple of middle aged gents and a middle aged couple. They politely moved away from the changing hut whilst we slipped into our bathing suits and sampled the beautifully warm water.

I would rate the temperature as a nice hot water – not steaming hot; just a nice, hot, perfect bath type temperature.

The water felt so silky on our skin, no doubt due to the mineral content. The clouds had cleared away at this point as we lay chin deep in the calming waters with the sun tanning our faces.

We didn’t want to leave!

We stayed about two hours, with numerous groups of people of all ages and nations coming and going. As one local stated when a large group of young adults (presumably Dutch) arrived: “In Iceland, there is no maximum capacity to a hot spring. There’s always room for one more!”.

Yet it never felt crowded, and we only dragged ourselves away with enough time to get to our hotel in time for the evening meal.

We checked into the Hotel Geysir (the actual sleeping accomodation is a minutes drive down the road in a light airy modern annex with excellent shared kitchen facilities) and went straight to dinner as they mentioned the kitchen closed at 9pm which was fast approaching.

My girlfriend is to, all extents and purposes, a vegetarian, and I try to avoid excessive meat consumption due to both moral and health reasons, but for the simple facts of convenience and enjoyment I do eat pretty much everything.

I will also try anything, especially if it’s new and exotic.

When I’d first heard that they’d served whale in Iceland, I’d had mixed feelings. Being against whaling I’d been initially repulsed, yet also intrigued. My girlfriend suggested that I’d only ever try it once anyway and I’ve always adopted the policy of ‘When In Rome…’… so one Mink Whale was ordered.

It wasn’t as I expected; looking, and tasting, far more like meat than fish. It was like a medium-rare steak in flavour and texture, with a slight metallic or kidney flavoured hint. The flesh inside looked odd – it reminded me of a turkish delight!

Apparently you have to eat it whilst hot, else it becomes almost uneatable. Being quite hungry at this stage, I wolfed it down, along with the excellent potato gratin stack and cauliflower puree.

I wouldn’t order it again. Not just from the moral perspective; I’d prefer a steak.

Several people on forums had commented on how expensive Iceland was. At the equivalent of £60 for two courses and a glass of wine each I thought the meal reasonably priced, considering the good quality. Over the weekend we were there we found most food and services at a price similar to the UK, but admittedly the accommodation and hire car had been considerable more than we’d pay for on other holidays abroad. My tip is to shop around and use a cashback site such as Topcashback (you can join up here).

Tired from our travels we went to bed, looking forward to what tomorrow would bring us.

Amazon sell an excellent guide: The Rough Guide to Iceland

Montignac diet part 1: I don’t do diets!

When my girlfriend first mentioned the Montignac diet (or Montignac method) to me, I was initially sceptical.

I’ve never been a believer in ‘dieting’ and instead believe that you should eat most things in moderation, avoiding the obvious
cakes and chips and eating sufficient fruit and veg, and exercising regularly.

Yet with a combination of a new natural diet drink (I will write another post about this later) and our own take on the Montignac
method, I’ve lost 10kgs – that’s 22lb, or about 1.5 stone – in several months and with a lot less exercise than I usually do. And
I’m still eating very enjoyable meals.

Previously I was having to exercise pretty hard 5 or 6 times a week and struggling to maintain my weight. I’m now just over 2kgs
(5lbs) lighter than that with no effort.

The concept of the Montignac method lies around the understanding of the different types of carbohydrates (carbs) and their
Glycemic Indexes (GI) – a measure of how a food increases blood sugar levels – and avoiding eating those high GI carbs in
conjuction with fats.

When food is digested, carbohydrates are transformed into sugars (glucose) which raises the blood sugar level – and also insulin
levels. This hormone is related to weight gain.

High GI carbs such as potatoes will result in higher blood sugar levels than low GI carbs such as lentils. Note that GI figures
aren’t exact and can change depending on various factors, for example, the foods level of hydration, how it has been processed,
or it’s ripeness. Rice has a high GI yet a long grain Basmiti rice can have much lower GI levels.

One exception is carrots. Although uncooked carrots have a relatively high GI (this increases even more when cooked) they have a
low carb content, so are not considered as ‘bad’ carbs.

In general though, we can define ‘bad’ carbs and ‘good’ carbs.

GI levels were first determined in the ’70s to help diabetics.

Montignac was the first to recommend using the glycemic index to aid with slimming.

His theory is that ‘bad’ carbs, such as potatoes, white rice and white bread, cannot be taken with fats. The thought is that the
combination of a high blood sugar release and fat intake will result in that fat being stored as body fat.

The body still needs fat – the idea is not to consume it at the same time as high GI carbs.

There’s also ‘good’ and ‘bad’ fats, as I’ve already discussed in my Keeping fit – the early days post on health and fitness. Essentially,
polyunsaturated omega 3 acids (fish fat) as well as monounsaturated fatty acids (olive oil) are ‘good’ for you, whereas you
should try and avoid saturated fatty acids such as butter and animal fat.

Montignac appreciated that most dieters suffer from a lack of food satisfaction and feeling hungry. He produced a book with
French and Meditterean recipes that were suited to his method – and sold 15 million copies! (Montignac Diet Cookbook)

However, as with most diets or health theories, there is plenty of debate and opposition.

Some scientific studies would appear to disprove it. Many nutrition experts claim that ANY calorie intake that exceeds the amount
that the body needs is converted into body fat, regardless.

Yet other studies disagree.

Let’s step back a moment.

There are so many different diets, health theories and lifestyle choices, proliferated by the popularity of the internet, that
there’s always going to be differences of opinion.

Mankind has evolved due to our ability to communicate.

But not our ability to agree. Hence wars. But that’s a bit deep for now… I can feel a separate post coming on 🙂

Anyway. My opinion is that you can’t take anything you read on the web at face value – especially regarding health and weight
loss. Hell, I don’t trust what my doctor says either.

For a start, EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT. I’ve highlighted that because it’s not just relevant in health, but in all aspects of life.

People have different metabolisms and react differently to various foods.

But lets state one clear fact: The human body is not designed to consume ‘junk food’. It has evolved over many thousands of years
to adapt to a changing diet since our monkey fruit picking days, but it can only evolve so quick; and it’s pretty clear in
today’s age of fast food, junk food and processed food that there will quite simply make you fat – or more importantly – die
quicker.

So I’m going with the premise that eating well is a good idea.

None of this ‘your body is a temple’ business, as I can’t help treat myself to the odd glass of wine. Or three.

Everything in moderation 😉

There’s nothing extreme about the Montignac diet – avoid high carb foods, particularly with fat. Fat can be eaten but without carbs.

Sounds fine to me… so why not try it?

Again, there’s so many opinions out there that you only ever know if something will work for you if you try it.

I did.

See more in my next post to follow shortly…

I just want to point out again that I am not a nutritionist, a dietician or a doctor. I’m a computer scientist! So this is just
my take on things and it’s worked well for me. When dieting you should always seek professional help if in doubt.

One of Michel Montignac’s best sellers: Eat Yourself Slim: The World’s BEST Method to Lose Weight and Stay Slim

Fat content – butter or marg?

As soon as you start thinking of dieting, and weight loss, you start thinking of reducing the amount of fat you consume. And that’s fine; but the body needs some fat – it carries out many roles, such as helping absorb some vitamins, providing energy and insulation.  It’s more about eating the right types of fat, and the combinations of fat with other foods – for example, one theory is that fats on their own or with proteins aren’t so bad, but fat with carbs – especially ones with a high GI (glycemic index) – are a big no no (I will write an article soon: Montignac diet – my interpretation). Well – that’s one theory anyway, as per most diets, they are debateable and there are plenty of conflicting opinions. But it seemed to work for me, and still falls within most peoples understanding of eating healthily, so I’m going to give it a thumbs up.

But back to fats. I’ve generally avoided using butter for many years, having been told that saturated fats are bad for your heart and cholesterol levels, and that unsaturated fats – particuality polyunsaturated fats – were much better, even ‘good’ for you. So since childhood, to my early thirties, I have pretty much avoided butter, and chose a ‘healthy’ margarine. More recently I’ve skipped both in an effort to reduce general fat intake, and found that sandwiches & wraps with tasty (and healthy) fillings tasted more or less the same with or without either butter or margarine, so scrapped them completely.

However, I still had it in my head that margarine was much healthier than butter.

Until I read this:

http://www.foodmatters.tv/articles-1/butter-vs-margarine

It’s a very interesting article, and makes many good points. But in my mind, it jumps to conclusions rather quickly. I quote: “When these fats are incorporated into skin cells, their mutation causes skin cancer”. What?? Where’s the evidence to support that? It’s a bit overkill.

I’d like to read more about this debate, but I do agree that margarine is very unnatural and one key aspect of eating healthily is to eat as naturally as possible. As soon as you start processing food then you’re stepping away from that. So butter is a better choice in that sense compared to margarine. Nonetheless, the fact remains that it IS high in saturated fats and has been proven (in numerous studies, although these are often debatable) to lead to high heart and general health problems.

So which do you choose?

I’d say: neither.

I eat plenty of fish, nuts and olives, and can’t resist the lure of cheese (similar to butter in terms of it’s fats), so I get plenty of the required fats from those foods, along with the meats I eat and the olive oil I use in cooking, so there’s no need for either. I generally avoid bread too (another article coming up soon about how bad bread can be for you) and even if I do opt for sandwich or a (slightly) healthier wrap/pita, I just fill it with enough tasty health food (a dash of yoghurt is great if it’s too dry) for me to quite happily avoid either.